Clinical Case Database / Category: Patient Management
Treatment of anaphylaxis
Publication details
Hannah R Brown, Michael Vassallo PhD FRCP
Foundation Years Journal, volume 3, issue 1, p.30 (123Doc Education, London, February 2009)
Abstract
You are called to see a 28-year-old man on the medical admissions unit. He is a type 1 diabetic in hospital with a community acquired pneumonia. The nurse tells you that he is looking increasingly unwell and has just been given IV amoxicillin as treatment for the pneumonia. He is not known to have any drug allergies but has not had amoxicillin before. You advise that the antibiotics are stopped immediately and you assess Mr D. On arrival, Mr D does not look well – he is having difficulty speaking to you and appears slightly confused. His respiratory rate is 25 breaths/minute and oxygen saturations are 85% on air. Examination of his chest demonstrates a marked wheeze throughout. Further examination shows him to have cool peripheries and you record a blood pressure of 80/55 and feel a weak, thready pulse, rate 124bpm. His capillary refill time is 3 seconds and he is becoming increasingly drowsy during your assessment. You suspect a diagnosis of anaphylaxis to the IV amoxicillin. How should you manage this patient?
Access the Clinical Cases Database
A subscription is required to read the full article. Please subscribe using one of the options below.
Product | Price | Subscription | |
---|---|---|---|
Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database | £29.00 | 6 months | |
Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database | £39.00 | 12 months |
Authors
Hannah R Brown
Bachelor of Medicine 2007
University of Southampton
Foundation Year 2 Doctor
The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Trust
Michael Vassallo PhD FRCP
Consultant Physician and Honorary Senior Lecturer
The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Trust
References
1. Johansson SG, Bieber T, Dahl R, Friedmann PS, Lanier BQ, Lockey RF, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol, May, 2004, 113(5):832–836.
2. "Anaphylaxis". In: Medicine at a Glance. P Davey (ed.) 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006, pp. 132–133.
3. Pumphrey RS, Roberts IS. Post-mortem findings after fatal anaphylactic reactions. J Clin Pathol, April 2000, 53(4):273–276.
4. Emergency treatment of anaphylactic reactions. The Resuscitation Council (UK), January 2008.
5. Ewan P. ABC of allergies: Anaphylaxis. BMJ, May 1998, 316(9):1442–1445.
6. Bautista E, Simons FE, Simons KJ, Becker AB, Duke K, Tillett M, et al. Epinephrine fails to hasten hemodynamic recovery in fully developed canine anaphylactic shock. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, June 2002, 128(2):151–164.
7. Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary. 54th edn. London: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2007.
8. Sheikh A, Ten BV, Brown SG, Simons FE. H1-antihistamines for the treatment of anaphylaxis: Cochrane systematic review. Allergy, August 2007, 62(8):830–837.
9. Kay LJ, Peachell PT. Mast cell beta2-adrenoceptors. Chem Immunol Allergy, 2005, 87:145–153.
10. Simons FE, Gu X, Simons KJ. Epinephrine absorption in adults: intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection. J Allergy Clin Immunol, November 2001, 108(5):871–873.
11. Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, Bottiger BW, Smith G. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation, December 2005, 67 Suppl 1:S39–S86.
12. Brown AF. Therapeutic controversies in the management of acute anaphylaxis. J Accid Emerg Med, March 1998, 15(2):89–95.
13. Gompels LL, Bethune C, Johnston SL, Gompels MM. Proposed use of adrenaline (epinephrine) in anaphylaxis and related conditions: a study of senior house officers starting accident and emergency posts. Postgrad Med J, July 2002, 78(921):416–418.
14. Jose R, Clesham GJ. Survey of the use of epinephrine (adrenaline) for anaphylaxis by junior hospital doctors. Postgrad Med J, September 2007, 83(983):610–611.
Disclaimers
Conflict Of Interest
The Journal requires that authors disclose any potential conflict of interest that they may have. This is clearly stated in the Journal’s published “Guidelines for Authors”. The Journal follows the Guidelines against Conflict of Interest published in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf).
Financial Statement
The authors of this article have not been paid. The Journal is financed by subscriptions and advertising. The Journal does not receive money from any other sources. The decision to accept or refuse this article for publication was free from financial considerations and was solely the responsibility of the Editorial Panel and Editor-in-Chief.
Patient Consent statement
All pictures and investigations shown in this article are shown with the patients’ consent. We require Authors to maintain patients’ anonymity and to obtain consent to report investigations and pictures involving human subjects when anonymity may be compromised. The Journal follows the Guidelines of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf). The Journal requires in its Guidelines for Authors a statement from Authors that “the subject gave informed consent”.
Animal & Human Rights
When reporting experiments on human subjects, the Journal requires authors to indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the HelsinkiDeclaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
About the Clinical Cases Database
The Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database is a selection of 600 peer-reviewed clinical cases in the field of patient safety and clinical practice, specifically focused on the clinical information needs of junior doctors, based around the Foundation Year Curriculum programme (MMC). The cases have been chosen to align with the Foundation Year Curriculum.
The database is fully searchable, or can be browsed by medical specialty. Abstracts can be read free of charge, however a subscription is required in order to read the complete cases.