Clinical Case Database / Category: Case Based Discussion

Ruptured abdominal aneurysm

Publication details

Mr Shiva Dindyal BSc MBBS MRCS, Mr Constantinos Kyriakides MB ChB MD FRCS
Foundation Years Journal, volume 2, issue 8, p.29 (123Doc Education, London, October 2008)

Abstract

A 65-year-old retired builder was admitted to casualty following a collapse. He was tachycardic and hypotensive with an increasingly distended abdomen. He was becoming drowsier and complaining of generalised abdominal and back pain. Previously he had suffered a myocardial infarction and was diabetic. He smoked 20 cigarettes a day and was clinically obese. On examination, he was cold, clammy and distressed. His abdomen was generally tender, distended, tense and pulsatile.

Access the Clinical Cases Database

A subscription is required to read the full article. Please subscribe using one of the options below.

ProductPriceSubscription
Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database£29.006 months
Add to cart
Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database£39.0012 months
Add to cart

Authors

Mr Shiva Dindyal BSc MBBS MRCS (Corresponding author)

General Surgery Specialty Registrar/Vascular
and Endovascular Research Fellow
Barts and The London NHS Trust
Circulatory Sciences Clinical Academic Unit
The Royal London Hospital
London E1 1BB

Mr Constantinos Kyriakides MB ChB MD FRCS

Consultant Vascular and Endovascular Surgeon
Barts and The London NHS Trust
Circulatory Sciences Clinical Academic Unit
London, UK

References

1. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 25 June-1 July 2005, 365(9478):2179-2186.
2. EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair and outcome in patients unfi for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 25 June-1 July 2005, 365(9478):2187-2192.
3. Offie of Population Census and Surveys, Mortality Statistics, England and Wales. London: HMSO, 1989.
4. Fowkes FGC, Maclntyre CCA, Ruckley CV. Increasing incidence of aortic aneurysms in England and Wales. Br Med J, 1989, 298:33-35.
5. Bengtsson H, Bergqvist D. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a population-based study. J Vasc Surg, 1993, 18:74-80.
6. Johansson G, Swedenborg J. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a study of incidence and mortality. Br J Surg, 1986, 73:101-103.
7. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Mortality results for a randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Lancet, 1998, 352:1649-1655.

Disclaimers

Conflict Of Interest

The Journal requires that authors disclose any potential conflict of interest that they may have. This is clearly stated in the Journal’s published “Guidelines for Authors”. The Journal follows the Guidelines against Conflict of Interest published in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf).

Financial Statement

The authors of this article have not been paid. The Journal is financed by subscriptions and advertising. The Journal does not receive money from any other sources. The decision to accept or refuse this article for publication was free from financial considerations and was solely the responsibility of the Editorial Panel and Editor-in-Chief.

Patient Consent statement

All pictures and investigations shown in this article are shown with the patients’ consent. We require Authors to maintain patients’ anonymity and to obtain consent to report investigations and pictures involving human subjects when anonymity may be compromised. The Journal follows the Guidelines of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf). The Journal requires in its Guidelines for Authors a statement from Authors that “the subject gave informed consent”.

Animal & Human Rights

When reporting experiments on human subjects, the Journal requires authors to indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the HelsinkiDeclaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

About the Clinical Cases Database

T​he Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database is​ a selection of 600 peer-reviewed clinical cases in the field of patient safety and clinical practice, specifically focused on the clinical information needs of junior doctors, based around the Foundation Year Curriculum programme (MMC). The cases have been chosen to align with the Foundation Year Curriculum.

The database is fully searchable, or can be browsed by medical specialty. Abstracts can be read free of charge, however a subscription is required in order to read the complete cases.