Clinical Case Database / Category: Clinical Care

Preoperative assessment of the surgical patient

Publication details

Dr Kamen Valchanov, Dr Andrew Klein
Foundation Years Journal, volume 6, issue 5, p.24 (123Doc Education, London, May 2012)

Abstract

The term pre-operative assessment implies that surgery has been planned, and that the patient should be prepared for the operation. However, the definition of pre-operative assessment has evolved, especially as new technology has become available to aid medical assessment. As well as this, patients are now usually admitted to hospital on the day of surgery, and pre-operative assessment has therefore been significantly expanded in its scope. It now encompasses all interventions aiming at evaluating the health state of an individual patient, assessing risks, and recommending best perioperative management, as well as communicating this plan with the patient and the multi-disciplinary team. In this article we will discuss the value of pre-operative assessment and some of the key points of this work. We will also illustrate this with some examples from real patients.

Access the Clinical Cases Database

A subscription is required to read the full article. Please subscribe using one of the options below.

ProductPriceSubscription
Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database£29.006 months
Add to cart
Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database£39.0012 months
Add to cart

Authors

Dr Kamen Valchanov

-

Dr Andrew Klein

Consultants in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care,
Papworth Hospital,
Cambridge,
CB23 3RE
andrew.klein@papworth.nhs.uk

References

1. Woollam CH. The Sister Anaesthetists of Norwich. Anaes 2002, 57:984-94.
2. Nilsson H, Stylianidis G, Haapamaki M, Nilsson E, Nordin P. Mortality after groin hernia surgery. Ann Surg 2007, 245:656-60.
3. McFarlane HJ, van der Horst N, Kerr L, McPhillips G, Burton H. The Scottish Audit of Surgical Mortality: a review of areas of concern related to anaesthesia over 10 years. Anaes 2009, 64:1324-31.
4. Hallward G, Valchanov K. An unexpected pre-operative diagnosis. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010, 11:89-90.
5. Smith TB, Stonell C, Purkayastha S, Paraskevas P. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a risk assessment method in non cardio-pulmonary surgery: a systematic review. Anaes 2009, 64:883-93.
6. Dawson J, Karalliedde L. Drug interactions and the clinical anaesthetist. Eur J Anaes 1998, 15:172-89.
7. Mayor S. NICE guidance clarifies when to do preoperative tests in elective surgery. BMJ 2003, 326:1418.
8. Klein AA, Arrowsmith JE. Should routine pre-operative testing be abandoned? Anaes 2011, 65:974-6.
9. Valchanov K, Steel, A. Preoperative investigation of the surgical patient. Surgery 2008, 26:363-8.
10. White SM, Baldwin TJ. Consent for anaesthesia. Anaes 2003, 58:760-74.
11. Calman KC. Communication of risk: choice, consent, and trust. Lancet 2002, 360:166-8.

Disclaimers

Conflict Of Interest

The Journal requires that authors disclose any potential conflict of interest that they may have. This is clearly stated in the Journal’s published “Guidelines for Authors”. The Journal follows the Guidelines against Conflict of Interest published in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf).

Financial Statement

The authors of this article have not been paid. The Journal is financed by subscriptions and advertising. The Journal does not receive money from any other sources. The decision to accept or refuse this article for publication was free from financial considerations and was solely the responsibility of the Editorial Panel and Editor-in-Chief.

Patient Consent statement

All pictures and investigations shown in this article are shown with the patients’ consent. We require Authors to maintain patients’ anonymity and to obtain consent to report investigations and pictures involving human subjects when anonymity may be compromised. The Journal follows the Guidelines of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf). The Journal requires in its Guidelines for Authors a statement from Authors that “the subject gave informed consent”.

Animal & Human Rights

When reporting experiments on human subjects, the Journal requires authors to indicate whether the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the HelsinkiDeclaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

About the Clinical Cases Database

T​he Foundation Years Clinical Cases Database is​ a selection of 600 peer-reviewed clinical cases in the field of patient safety and clinical practice, specifically focused on the clinical information needs of junior doctors, based around the Foundation Year Curriculum programme (MMC). The cases have been chosen to align with the Foundation Year Curriculum.

The database is fully searchable, or can be browsed by medical specialty. Abstracts can be read free of charge, however a subscription is required in order to read the complete cases.